▶ Prophet not the Last Prophet-Deobandi Belief-Aakhir Ikhtilaf Kyun (CD 1) part 4-# Okarvi
- 10 years ago
Akhir Ikhtilaf Kyun- Why the Differences-
It is forbidden to use words of Aalim ul Ghaib, and to have complete Ilm ul Ghaib is not possible through wisdom. And that the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], has complete knowledge of Ghaib could not be proved through wisdom.
If indirect Ilm ul Ghaib, that Allaah Taa'laa has given him, is Baz means a little then Maulana Thanvi writes that it is to confer Ilm e Ghaib on the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], if true by anyone (Maulana Thanvi is not admitting it) then the question is whether is it Kul Ghaib or Baz Ghaib?
If it is Baz Ilm e Ghaib and not Kul Ilm e Ghaib then it is not special with the
Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam],
just like Ilm e Ghaib is given to everyone, every child, animals and even beasts are given too. Word here used for simile. Here the knowledge of Prophet (Peace be upon him) is mentioned like the knowledge of animals, mad and children is the worst act of disgrace towards the
Holy Prophet (peace be upon him)
It is the severest act of disgrace for that Thanvi has not yet asked for forgiveness. People used to say that he has changed the text as written in the other books. He used words the Ghair e Ambiya instead of animals and mad but these words are not the proof of his forgiveness.
If someone says that he begged pardon then it has to prove. The people who are fighting over this also seek forgiveness. Some people say the word ‘aisa’ means like or as much but in both cases this word is used for simile and disgrace. This is severe insolence to mention the knowledge of the
Holy Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], like animals and Thanvi has neither begged pardon nor changed the text and it is sheer insolence of Thanvi. God [Allaah Taa'laa] forbid for this act of insolence and I have shown you the real text..
6-REFERENCE
Thinking about the Holy Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], during prayers is worse than thinking about ox and donkey.
(God forbid) Book Siraat e Mustaqeem, page 86.Persian Publication
Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi:
I am showing you the book Siraat e Mustaqeem, published in 1308 AH by Maktba Mujtbai Delhi and written by Ismail Dehlvi. Some people say that this book is not written by Ismail Dehlvi, I will present more facts about this too. With reference to your question on page 86, it is my habit to mark pages so I have marked these pages too.
More More please visit our web site
http://www.allamahkaukabnooraniokarvi.com/the-40-reference--part-1--why-the-differences.html
It is forbidden to use words of Aalim ul Ghaib, and to have complete Ilm ul Ghaib is not possible through wisdom. And that the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], has complete knowledge of Ghaib could not be proved through wisdom.
If indirect Ilm ul Ghaib, that Allaah Taa'laa has given him, is Baz means a little then Maulana Thanvi writes that it is to confer Ilm e Ghaib on the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], if true by anyone (Maulana Thanvi is not admitting it) then the question is whether is it Kul Ghaib or Baz Ghaib?
If it is Baz Ilm e Ghaib and not Kul Ilm e Ghaib then it is not special with the
Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam],
just like Ilm e Ghaib is given to everyone, every child, animals and even beasts are given too. Word here used for simile. Here the knowledge of Prophet (Peace be upon him) is mentioned like the knowledge of animals, mad and children is the worst act of disgrace towards the
Holy Prophet (peace be upon him)
It is the severest act of disgrace for that Thanvi has not yet asked for forgiveness. People used to say that he has changed the text as written in the other books. He used words the Ghair e Ambiya instead of animals and mad but these words are not the proof of his forgiveness.
If someone says that he begged pardon then it has to prove. The people who are fighting over this also seek forgiveness. Some people say the word ‘aisa’ means like or as much but in both cases this word is used for simile and disgrace. This is severe insolence to mention the knowledge of the
Holy Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], like animals and Thanvi has neither begged pardon nor changed the text and it is sheer insolence of Thanvi. God [Allaah Taa'laa] forbid for this act of insolence and I have shown you the real text..
6-REFERENCE
Thinking about the Holy Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], during prayers is worse than thinking about ox and donkey.
(God forbid) Book Siraat e Mustaqeem, page 86.Persian Publication
Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi:
I am showing you the book Siraat e Mustaqeem, published in 1308 AH by Maktba Mujtbai Delhi and written by Ismail Dehlvi. Some people say that this book is not written by Ismail Dehlvi, I will present more facts about this too. With reference to your question on page 86, it is my habit to mark pages so I have marked these pages too.
More More please visit our web site
http://www.allamahkaukabnooraniokarvi.com/the-40-reference--part-1--why-the-differences.html