Fed Chair Jerome Powell Discusses The Economy Amid Inflation Slowing
Fed Chair Jerome Powell spoke on Monday about the economy.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00David, I
00:29think I'll leave the markets out of it for a second, if I can, and just say that it was
00:33really a very sad day for our country.
00:36Political violence has no place in our society, and I condemn it in the strongest terms.
00:40I know we all do.
00:42A man died at a political rally.
00:45Two other people were critically injured.
00:46So just a sad day, and I'll say that I'm grateful that the injuries to the former president
00:50were not more serious.
00:51I'd rather not comment on the markets.
00:52It's too...
00:53No foreplay, huh?
01:20So I'm going to take that as a great opportunity to talk a little bit about the economy, and
01:25then talk about where that leaves us with policy.
01:28So I would just start by saying that the U.S. economy has performed really remarkably well
01:32over the last couple of years.
01:352023, last year, was a year in which the economy grew well above 3%.
01:40The labor market remained very strong.
01:43Unemployment remained very low.
01:44And inflation came down at quite a sharp pace, particularly in the second half of the year,
01:49by a very large amount.
01:51And that forecast was almost unheard of.
01:55It was unheard of before 2023.
01:57So big upside surprise that year.
02:00This year, we had expected the economy to slow a bit gradually, the labor market to
02:04continue to gradually cool off after being overheated a couple of years ago, and inflation
02:09to continue to make progress.
02:11And something like that is basically what has happened.
02:15The economy is growing now at about 1.5% in the first half of the year.
02:20Most forecasters have about a 2% growth rate for the full year.
02:22The labor market, again, has moved into better and better balance, to the point where I think
02:26you can now say it's essentially no tighter than it was in 2019 before the pandemic.
02:32Remember that the labor market of 2019 was a very strong labor market.
02:36So we're back to that place, no longer overheated.
02:39On inflation, in the first quarter, we didn't make any more progress.
02:43The second quarter, actually, we did make some more progress.
02:47We've had now three better readings.
02:49And if you average them, that's a pretty good pace.
02:52So turning to policy, your question, what we said is that we didn't think it would be
02:57appropriate to begin to loosen policy until we had greater confidence that inflation was
03:02moving sustainably down to 2%.
03:05We've been waiting on that.
03:06And I would say we didn't gain any additional confidence in the first quarter.
03:10But the three readings in the second quarter, including the one from last week, do add somewhat
03:14to confidence.
03:15We've also said that we're a dual-mandate bank.
03:19For a long time, since inflation arrived, it's been appropriate to focus mainly on inflation.
03:24But now that inflation has come down and the labor market has, indeed, cooled off, we're
03:29going to be looking at both mandates.
03:31They're in much better balance.
03:33And that means that if we were to see an unexpected weakening in the labor market, then that might
03:38also be a reason for reaction by us.
03:42Yeah, I think that makes sense.
03:44And so, in terms of, I can make sure I understand, the markets are suggesting, futures markets,
03:53that there's a 90% chance that the Fed will lower its discount rate in September.
04:00Do you think the markets are worthy of your talking about?
04:03So today, I'm not going to be sending any signals one way or the other on any particular
04:10meeting.
04:11So, just to ruin the fun right at the beginning, I simply, you know, we're going to make these
04:16decisions meeting by meeting, and we're going to make them on the basis of the data as they
04:19come in, the evolving data, the evolving outlook, and also the balance of risks, now that the
04:24two mandates are basically close to being in balance.
04:27There are some people who say that the Fed is not likely to lower its rate.
04:31The President is a campaigner.
04:33If you criticize something on the market, do you have any comment on whether that's
04:37accurate or not?
04:38I do.
04:39I do.
04:40So, our undertaking, at all times, is that we'll make our decisions based on the incoming
04:45data, the evolving outlook, balance of risks, and only on that.
04:49We don't take political considerations into account.
04:51We don't put up a political filter on our decisions.
04:54That would not, it's hard enough to make these decisions based on the appropriate factors.
04:59If you're going to add a whole different filter in an area where we're not experts, that's
05:03not going to improve the quality of our decisions, and it's also not the orders we have from
05:07Congress.
05:08Our orders from Congress are to use our tools to foster maximum employment and price stability
05:12and to do so without political considerations.
05:15That's what we're always going to do.
05:17If you look at the modern record, that is what we do, and we don't think about election
05:21cycles or anything that's political.
05:23Okay.
05:24So, the Fed has set a target for inflation of 2%.
05:28Now, can you clarify, does that mean that the inflation rate has to be at 2% before
05:33you're ready to move, if you are ready to move, or does it have to be within sight,
05:37and what does it mean to be within sight?
05:39So, when we change interest rates, that tightens financial conditions, and that in turn affects
05:45economic outcomes, you know, growth, labor markets, and ultimately inflation, but with
05:50lags that can be long and variable, as Milton Friedman famously said.
05:55And the implication of that is that if you wait until inflation gets all the way down
05:59to 2%, you've probably waited too long, because the tightening that you're doing, or the
06:04level of tightness that you have, is still having effects which will probably drive inflation
06:08below 2%.
06:09So, we've been very clear that you wouldn't wait for inflation to get all the way down
06:13to 2%.
06:14Our test has been for the past quite some time that we wanted to have greater confidence
06:20that inflation was moving sustainably down toward our 2% target, and what increases that
06:26confidence in that is more good inflation data, and lately here, we have been getting
06:30some of that.
06:31Okay.
06:32So, when you say we, let's talk about who we is.
06:35The FOMC, for those who don't follow Washington acronyms, it stands for what?
06:40What is the FOMC?
06:41It's the Federal Open Market Committee.
06:43Okay, and who is on that committee?
06:46It's a little bit complicated, our structure is.
06:48We have seven governors here in Washington, all nominated by the president and confirmed
06:53to staggered 14-year terms, and we have 12 reserve bank presidents at reserve banks around
06:59the country.
07:00All 19, 7 plus 12, are participants on the FOMC.
07:05In any given year, all of the seven governors vote, and five of the 12 reserve bank presidents
07:11vote, but one of the voters is always the New York Fed.
07:14Okay, and so when you have an FOMC meeting, how many do you have a year?
07:17We have eight a year.
07:19Okay, so you have eight a year, and when you get together, you get together for two days
07:23or so?
07:24We do.
07:26So it generally starts at noon or in the morning of a Tuesday, and we go all day.
07:31We generally talk about the economy, the financial stability issues, whatever special topics
07:36there may be, and at the end of the day, each person speaks on those things, and I speak
07:41at the end of that day.
07:43Then there's a brief presentation on monetary policy, and then we go to dinner upstairs
07:47in the Martin Building, and we come back the next morning, we come in at 9 o'clock, and
07:51we talk about monetary policy until we're satisfied with the outcome of monetary policy,
07:55and that usually takes most of the morning.
07:58Okay, so when you go into an FOMC meeting the first day, do you pretty much know where
08:05you want to come out at the end of the second day, or do you want to listen to everybody
08:08and you haven't made up your mind yet?
08:10You know, the way it works is that I talk to the other 18 participants regularly, and
08:16I talk to all of them at least once in the 10 days before the meeting, and I'm thinking
08:21about this three or four weeks before the meeting, you know, what should we want to
08:25achieve, what data do we need to see, how do we want to change our communications, all
08:29those things.
08:30And so I talk to people, listen to them, and I try to put together an answer that has broad
08:36support on the committee.
08:37And so when we go into the committee on Tuesday morning, you know, I'm confident, usually,
08:44that I know where this is going to go, but, you know, things happen, we get data during
08:48the meeting sometimes, events happen, but largely you go in kind of knowing what the
08:54likely outcome is, and that's the design of it.
08:58So normally, you know, if somebody calls somebody, you call all the other board members, FOMC
09:03members from time to time, when you call them, do you have trouble getting your call returned
09:07or do you get a call right back, or do they take your call right away?
09:12These calls are scheduled, generally, and they go all day long.
09:16I have, like, the Friday before the meeting, I think I have 11 half-hour calls, and it's
09:21pretty, you know, we talk about the economy, we talk about very specific aspects of the
09:26economy, about our mandate, and then we talk about policy.
09:29So there's a lot to talk about, and I take pretty careful notes, and people think, but
09:34by this point, they've read all of the preparatory materials probably twice, they've talked about
09:39their staffs, and so, you know, you get a really good sense of what people's thinking
09:43is.
09:44It's a very good process.
09:45But you don't feel you have to have unanimity when you make a decision, right?
09:49No.
09:50You know, I always try to listen carefully to everybody, and I find that if you do listen
09:56and understand people's points and try very hard to incorporate them into what we're doing,
10:01for most people, most of the time, that's going to be enough.
10:04People do dissent, that's completely fine.
10:07We actually have, given that we have 12 reserve banks with their own economic staff, and people
10:12with different backgrounds on the board and among the reserve banks, we have a disparity
10:16of views at every meeting on every question.
10:19And, but people do, I mean, I think there's a, you want to dissent on important things,
10:24and so people are perfectly able to dissent, and when they think that's appropriate, they
10:29do.
10:30So a lot of people in Washington government agencies are very good at leaking things.
10:34You're not that good at that.
10:36Why doesn't the Fed, why doesn't the Fed leak more?
10:39Why don't you kind of leak a lot more about what you're going to do?
10:41You just don't leak that much.
10:43I am, I'm kind of proud of that, actually.
10:45We, we do take our obligations to confidentiality very, very seriously, and because we know,
10:52you know, how consequential it would be for someone at the Fed to be leaking.
10:57You know, we just, our, our whole success depends on having the public's confidence
11:03that we're, that we're ethical, and that we're working on behalf of all Americans,
11:07and not on behalf of ourselves, and we're not leaking, and that kind of thing.
11:11So we do have a culture, when we're working on a, for example, a regulatory matter, or
11:18some, you know, matter involving one of the banks, it never leaks out of the Fed.
11:22So I am proud of that record.
11:25Okay, so if you go back into history, when inflation began to arise after COVID,
11:32at some point people said, including you, that it was transitory.
11:36In hindsight, what do you think people missed about the nature of the inflation?
11:42Why was it more enduring than people initially thought?
11:45So these are, this is a question that people will be writing papers about
11:49and debating longer after all of us are gone.
11:52So, and it's early, it's actually kind of, kind of soon to be answering it,
11:56but I think it's, so here's my answer to that question.
11:59When inflation arrived in March of 2023, it was really coming out of the goods sector,
12:06and it was connected to really high demand for goods, and it was, and, and, you know,
12:11the supply chains, global supply chains, which account for most manufactured goods,
12:15collapsed because of too much demand and because of COVID.
12:18And, you know, so, but, and to us, that looked like a temporary fleeting situation.
12:25We also lost several million people out of the labor force.
12:28So wages went way up as the economy really boomed when we reopened the economy.
12:33And we thought, you know, there, we were getting, vaccines were coming in,
12:37and we thought that that would fix itself too.
12:40Kids would go back to school.
12:41We essentially overestimated how quickly the economy would return to normal.
12:46It finally, these things finally did happen in 2023, but it didn't happen in 2021 or 2.
12:53And what we meant by transitory was that it would go away fairly quickly
12:57without the need for our intervention.
13:00You don't want to intervene with interest rates if,
13:03if something's going to go away quickly without us intervening because, you know,
13:07monetary policy, as I mentioned, works with long and variable lags.
13:10So the lure is you look through things like contemporary oil shock.
13:15So that was the mistake was that it actually, it actually didn't reverse itself.
13:20The problem with the supply side didn't reverse themselves until 2023 when they really did,
13:25when we got, we got a big burst of employment and also the supply chains were fixed.
13:30So in hindsight, now knowing everything you now know, would you have done anything differently?
13:34Would you have had less quantitative easing?
13:36Would you have changed interest rates differently?
13:38What would you have done differently now knowing everything we now know?
13:41You know, it's, it's almost unfair.
13:43You know, hindsight's always 2020, right?
13:46You know, we remember what we were doing in real time.
13:49We went from a really nice economy in December of 2019 to a global partial shutdown of the economy.
13:58And we were contemplating, there was no thought that vaccines were around the corner.
14:03The economy's closing down.
14:04We were looking at severe and perhaps prolonged downside risks.
14:09Literally people thinking and doing work on, are we going to have another depression?
14:12Is it going to be the 1930s?
14:14So governments around the world, and particularly the United States government,
14:18really went to work to provide a lot of support to the economy.
14:22We did everything we could, including many things that were right, you know, that we,
14:26red lines that we'd never crossed.
14:28We crossed them to support the economy and support the financial system.
14:32And it was all done because we were managing severe downside risks, which did not materialize.
14:37We did not have a depression.
14:39And part of that is because of what we did.
14:42Then the economy reopens, and demand is very, very strong.
14:46And we saw, basically we saw a big burst of inflation everywhere, including in the United States.
14:52It was different in different places.
14:54But, you know, so that's what happened.
14:56And, you know, it's not, that's how I would answer that.
14:59Okay, but so what you did, you're happy with what you did in hindsight, you would say?
15:04In foresight.
15:05I think that the work that we did in 2020 in response to the pandemic will stand up very well in history.
15:13I think people will look at the things that we did, and essentially the financial system was grinding to a halt all around the world.
15:21We acted, we were the first central bank, and we were the most, you know, supportive.
15:26And, you know, I think that work will hold together when historians are looking back on it in the long term.
15:33I think when you get to the inflation era, that becomes a different question.
15:37And, you know, people were going to be arguing about that for a long time.
15:40As a result of the action we took, and the economy was thought to slow down a fair bit,
15:47and many people used the phrase hard landing to describe, hard landing is a euphemism for recession, I guess.
15:54People thought in 2023 we might have a hard landing.
15:57People thought in 2024 we might have a hard landing.
16:00And many of these people were economists, professionally trained economists, but they seemed to be wrong.
16:05So do you rely on these economists very much in the future when you're projecting whether you should listen to their views
16:12on where the economy is going, or how do you react to the fact that we haven't had a hard landing
16:17and disappointed all those economists?
16:21So I'll just say that, you know, as someone famously said, predictions are very difficult, especially about the future.
16:31And also, I know a lot of economic forecasters, and forecasters are a humble lot with much to be humble about.
16:41It is extremely difficult.
16:43Every good forecaster will tell you that it's very, very hard to know what the economy is going to do.
16:49To give you a good example, in our Teal book, every FOMC cycle, there's a book that goes out,
16:56and there's a baseline forecast in that.
16:58And our forecasters are really, they're really the top people in the field.
17:02And they give you that baseline.
17:04They also give you a section in that book which shows six, seven, or eight alternative scenarios,
17:10which they also regard as plausible.
17:12So it's always a probability thing like that.
17:16It's like we have this, we've identified this one thing.
17:19So last year was a big surprise, and it was a big upside surprise.
17:24So, of course, we welcome those.
17:26We'd be happy to have more of those.
17:28But it just was one of those things where, you know, things turned out much better for a whole variety of reasons.
17:34I will say that on the hard landing question,
17:36I have always felt like there was a pathway to getting inflation back down to our 2% goal on a sustainable basis
17:46without the kind of pain in the labor market,
17:49the kind of high unemployment that has been typical of tightening cycles and getting inflation down.
17:55And the reason why my colleagues and I thought that was that the labor market was so overheated
18:01that it could cool down quite a bit without having to.
18:05There still is apparently no slack in the labor market.
18:09The labor market does not have slack.
18:11Essentially, you're at equilibrium now.
18:13But look where inflation is.
18:14Inflation is at 2.5%.
18:16So this was in defiance of a lot of conventional wisdom, but we thought that was right.
18:20And that says that, you know, you have to be, one thing you learn is humility in forecasting.
18:26So I wouldn't rule it out, but I would say that the kind of hard landing scenario is certainly not the most likely or a likely scenario.
18:34So you have said you have a target of 2% inflation.
18:37You want to get an insight of 2%.
18:39Do you have a similar target for unemployment?
18:41If unemployment went to 4%, are you saying, well, that's okay because we don't need to do anything because 4% is tolerable?
18:47Or do you have a similar kind of target as you do with inflation?
18:51You can't reduce unemployment to a single number for a couple reasons.
18:57First of all, the natural rate of unemployment probably moves through the cycle and over time.
19:03Maximum employment is a function of many, many different variables.
19:07It doesn't reduce itself to a specific number that would be durable over time.
19:11So inflation has 2% inflation some years ago became the global standard that everyone aims for in one way or another.
19:20Some people have suggested that the Fed's independence is not as good as people talk about it being,
19:26and that maybe we'd better have more White House coordination with the Fed.
19:30I'm sure you've heard about this.
19:33I think that – any comments on that?
19:37I'd be happy to comment on what independence – on the point of central bank independence.
19:42So I think a long time ago people learned that a central bank that's independent of political consideration does a better job getting inflation under control.
19:51And that has now – that has accepted wisdom in all advanced economies around the world.
19:55It's also a principle that has very, very strong and broad support where it really matters, which is in Congress.
20:01You know, you talk to senior leaders in both chambers, in both political parties,
20:07and they all understand that you want an independent central bank that doesn't run monetary policy to support
20:15or oppose any particular politician or political party.
20:19Independence is one thing, but you still have some information sharing.
20:23So how do you coordinate or share information with the administration?
20:27Do you regularly meet with the Secretary of Treasury or White House staff people?
20:31Or how do you communicate with them?
20:33So there's a very standard set of relationships which doesn't change at all, administration to administration.
20:39And it – I'll start anywhere, but Council of Economic Advisers is in the White House.
20:45We have lunch with them every month or so, although they get canceled sometimes because we're all busy.
20:51But that's one thing.
20:53This – I have breakfast with the Secretary of the Treasury every week unless she's traveling or I'm traveling.
21:01I have – since there was a National Economic Council,
21:05there's been a regular slash sometimes irregular breakfast with the head of the NEC, and I do that too.
21:12Do you ever get a call from the President of the United States saying interest rates are too high or something like that?
21:17So ever? No.
21:20I would say that meetings with the President are rare and appropriately so.
21:27So you are – you were originally appointed to the board of the Fed by President Obama.
21:34Yes.
21:35And you're appointed chair by President Trump and reappointed by President Biden.
21:38And your term as chair goes through, I think, May of 2026.
21:42That's right.
21:43Any thought about staying through all the way through May 2026?
21:47Are you going to do that?
21:49Yes.
21:50Okay.
21:51And if some president came along and said, well, you did a great job, I'd like to reappoint you, would you consider that?
21:58I have nothing for you on that today.
22:01Okay.
22:03And is being chair of the Fed an enjoyable job or not so much?
22:11It is, actually.
22:13I think I enjoy it.
22:16I enjoy it quite a bit.
22:18I do.
22:19First of all, it's a great honor.
22:20It's incredibly interesting.
22:21I love the people we work with.
22:22I love the institution.
22:24At this time in my life, it's just been a great thing.
22:27I'm in my 13th year there now, and it's just been – it's been, you know, really challenging and all that.
22:33But what else would you want?
22:34You know, I'm very happy doing the job.
22:36So you're obviously in pretty good shape.
22:38How do you stay in shape?
22:39Do you walk a lot or you ride bikes or what do you do?
22:42Yes, I do those things.
22:44I swim, I ride my bike, I go to the gym a lot.
22:46I try to stay fit, as you will remember from our days together.
22:48Right.
22:49So are you – but when you were, let's say, riding a bike, did people, you know, get out of the way or do you have –
22:56Nobody knows you with a bike helmet and goggles on.
22:59You're just another person on the road.
23:01So I think you have said somewhere that when the Fed does lower interest rates, not saying that you're saying it's going to do that,
23:10but if the Fed does lower interest rates at some point, you didn't think it was ever going to go back to kind of the free money
23:15practically of years ago when interest rates were almost zero.
23:19Is that a fair statement that you don't think it's a good idea to go back to interest rates as low as they once were?
23:25The period between the global financial crisis and the pandemic was historically unusual from the standpoint that we had ever lower
23:34interest rates through that era, including part of the era when, for example,
23:39sovereign debt of major European sovereigns was trading at a significantly negative rate.
23:45And so that was quite unusual.
23:47And still, even with rates that low, inflation was very low below target.
23:52And so the question is, what caused that?
23:55And are the forces that caused that gone for now?
23:59And I think most people attribute the low inflation era to slow-moving forces like demographics, globalization, technological evolution,
24:09things like that.
24:11And those may or may not have changed.
24:13But nonetheless, I look at where we are now.
24:16Our funds rate is 5.3 percent roughly, give or take.
24:20And it feels like it's restrictive, but not severely restrictive.
24:25So it tells me that rates, at least for now, are the neutral rate must have risen,
24:30probably has risen from where it was during the inter-crisis period.
24:35And I think instinctively, I can't prove this.
24:39We're going to learn about this empirically.
24:41But it seems to me that the neutral rate is probably higher than it was during the inter-crisis period.
24:48And so rates will be higher.
24:49So the Federal Reserve, without saying you're going to lower interest rates at this point,
24:53if you did lower interest rates at some time, I thought you had said you didn't want to lower interest rates
24:59and then maybe say, well, maybe we made a mistake and we're going to increase them again.
25:02You want to have a policy that's fairly consistent for a while.
25:06In other words, lower interest rates but not bounce back and forth every FOMC meeting.
25:10Is that a fair summary?
25:12That wouldn't be a great outcome.
25:14But we don't want to be too risk-averse.
25:16We know that the economy is unpredictable.
25:19And the test we've said is we want to have greater confidence that inflation is moving sustainably down to 2 percent
25:26or alternatively if we see unexpected weakening in the labor market or some combination of those two.
25:31And when we see that and the data really show that and that's reflected in our confidence and our understanding,
25:38then it will be time for us to move.
25:40And we won't worry.
25:41Of course, it wouldn't be great if you were moving up and down quite a bit.
25:45That wouldn't be ideal.
25:47Some of your predecessors used to speak in what I call Fed speak,
25:50which is to say incomprehensible to the average person.
25:54You try to actually explain things.
25:57Is that because you're not an economist or you just like to explain things better
26:01because you actually sort of explain what you're likely to do at the Fed and then you actually explain afterwards?
26:06Does that upset a lot of people at the Fed that you actually try to put it in English?
26:11No, I don't think so.
26:14No, as you know, I enjoy communicating with people.
26:17And I didn't have a career as an academic economist.
26:21I'm not a trained economist, so I don't speak like one.
26:25And that seems to – I do hear a lot from, for example,
26:28people on Capitol Hill that they really appreciate that they can understand what I'm saying.
26:32So today the ECB lowered their interest rates recently.
26:39So why do you think the ECB lowered interest rates before the Federal Reserve?
26:45Are their economies weaker than ours or what?
26:48Yeah, so there are differences if you look around the world.
26:54And the big difference between the United States and many other nations is just that our economy has been so much stronger.
27:01The European Union went through a significant period of very, very low growth,
27:09while we were growing 3 percent-plus last year.
27:12So we're in a different place.
27:14And actually what's more remarkable about the current situation is how much there is in common between what happened.
27:24Inflation broke out everywhere.
27:26Central banks did kind of very similar things.
27:29There's little differences in timing in terms of starting to loosen policy.
27:34But really the era, I think, will be known much more for its commonalities than it is for its differences like this.
27:40So when the FOMC makes a decision, let's say, to increase rates or lower rates, they finish their final meeting.
27:47You are authorized then to go out and explain what it is.
27:52How long after the meeting ends before you go out and publicly explain it?
27:56Is it 20 minutes or so?
27:58It's three or four hours usually.
28:00Three or four hours?
28:01Yes, because the meeting might end at, you know, I'm out at 2.30 p.m.
28:05That's when the press conference starts at 2.30.
28:07So usually the meeting is over by 11.
28:09And you don't worry that things will leak out in that interim period of time, I assume?
28:12No, no, I don't.
28:14Okay.
28:15You know, people know better than that, I think.
28:17So in some parts of the society these days, people are making decisions based on something called artificial intelligence, AI.
28:26Have you ever thought about, you know, calling up ChatGBT and saying, you know, here's all the data we have.
28:33What do you think about would be a good idea?
28:35Have you ever thought about that, or are they not going to like you do that?
28:38We haven't done that.
28:39I mean, we have done little things, like we've asked ChatGBT to generate questions for the press conference.
28:47And I'm happy to report for any journalists who are here that the questions were not as good as the ones we get from real journalists.
28:53What about my questions?
28:54How do they compare to my questions?
28:57Okay.
28:58No comment.
28:59All right.
29:00So they weren't that great.
29:01Okay.
29:02So today at the Federal Reserve Board, you are not involved in picking anybody who's on the Federal Reserve Board.
29:10The president makes those decisions.
29:12Do they ever call you for advice on who you might pick or they might pick?
29:16It has happened, but it's, I would say, not the norm now.
29:21The Reserve Bank presidents are different.
29:23We play a role with the search committees from the Reserve Banks on that.
29:26So every summer there's a meeting of the Federal Reserve people out in Jackson Hole.
29:33What do you all do out there?
29:34I mean, I always wonder.
29:35You wear cowboy boots.
29:37You go and ride horses.
29:38What do you all do?
29:39Why do you need to go to Jackson Hole?
29:40Why not go to someplace closer to Washington, D.C., Baltimore-like?
29:44Cowboy boots are worn by some, but not all.
29:49I don't wear them myself.
29:51So what it is, it's an academic conference.
29:53So the Kansas City Fed, which puts this on, they'll pick a topic,
29:57and then they'll find really top economists to write papers about that topic or more than one topic.
30:03You come to Jackson Hole.
30:06They present their paper.
30:08People critique it.
30:09They praise it and that kind of thing, and that's the mornings.
30:12And in the afternoon, people go take a hike.
30:14And let me be clear, this is not a rate hike.
30:16It's an actual physical hike.
30:19You usually make a speech out there, I think, every year.
30:22Yes.
30:23Traditionally, I've done this every year, but not every Fed chair has done it every year.
30:30But I give the opening speech, and it doesn't have to have anything to do with the topic of the conference.
30:34I just give a speech.
30:36And is it carefully worked on by the staff?
30:38Do you make sure you say something that sounds interesting, but you don't make any news?
30:42No, actually.
30:43I try to do, you know, typically what I do is I talk about the, you know,
30:47it's really focused on the economic outlook and that kind of thing at any given point in time.
30:52At Jackson Hole, I've tried to take a step back or move to a higher level
30:56and try to say things that have a little more generality to them and see what can we learn, for example.
31:01Now, the Federal Reserve is over 100 years old.
31:04It was created under Woodrow Wilson.
31:06If you were around then, what would you have suggested they do better than they did in creating the system?
31:12Or do you think the system works pretty well after 100 years and you wouldn't change it very much?
31:16So I'm giving myself perfect hindsight here.
31:18I would do what Congress did in 1933.
31:23So the original Fed didn't have an FOMC,
31:26and it really didn't function very well during the early parts of the Depression or during other.
31:33So in 1933, the current structure was put in place, and that's with the FOMC, with a number of governors,
31:41and the voting arrangements.
31:43And I think that arrangement is fine.
31:45It works really well.
31:46In the 70s, the dual mandate was added.
31:49But ultimately, we're not looking for any law change.
31:52We think we have the authorities that we need.
31:54We think that the law is in just a fine place.
31:57Okay.
31:58So basically, you think the system works reasonably well as it is today.
32:02And today, what is the biggest economic challenge you think facing the country?
32:08Is it growth?
32:09Is it inflation?
32:11Hard landing potentially?
32:13What are you most worried about?
32:15What keeps you up at night, if anything, in the economy?
32:17So I'll say in the short term, that's what keeps me up at night.
32:21Literally, the thing I'm thinking about in the middle of the night is always this balance we have between not wanting to –
32:27if we ease too early, we can undermine the progress on inflation.
32:30And if we wait too late, we can undermine economic activity.
32:33We can undermine the expansion.
32:36So we want to get this right.
32:38And getting it right is incredibly important for the people we serve.
32:41So that is really – that's what I spend a lot of my thinking time on.
32:46Longer term, there are lots of things to worry about.
32:49But that's really what keeps me up at night.
32:51So most people, they have dinner with friends sometimes.
32:53How can you have dinner with friends without hinting at what you're thinking about?
32:57And do you ever get suggestions from your friends at dinner, this is what you should do?
33:01And how do you respond when they kind of say, maybe you should lower interest rates?
33:04Do you just keep eating or what?
33:07You might define the word friend to mean doesn't ask you about interest rates.
33:11So – no, people don't do that generally.
33:14You know, people I don't know will always say, hey, cut rates.
33:17Somebody said that in the elevator this morning.
33:21Did that influence you or no?
33:25I said, thank you, sir.
33:27No, but I mean, you know, people say things, but, you know, it's fine.
33:32So today, for somebody that would like to be the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board in the future,
33:37is it a job you would recommend to your best friend or your best enemy?
33:41I think it's a great job.
33:43I think, again, what I – the last thing Chairman Bernanke said to me as he was – that day,
33:49I went to see him that day, his last day at the Fed.
33:52He said, you learn so much at the Fed.
33:54Remember, Ben Bernanke was a top five monetary economist in the world when he arrived at the Fed.
34:01He learned a lot at the Fed.
34:02So can you imagine how much I've learned, you know, starting?
34:04So it's just – it's never felt like work.
34:07It's so interesting all the time.
34:09And also, you know, the dedication of the people who work there, 90 – you know, and the staff,
34:14these are people who have chosen a life of not being in the public spotlight.
34:19They just want to do their work and serve the public, and they're very dedicated.
34:23It's a wonderful place, and I would recommend the job.
34:26So the Fed is also responsible for – the way the Fed is set up,
34:29you're worried about a stable currency, I assume –
34:33No.
34:34Well, not currency.
34:35You're worried about –
34:36Stable prices.
34:37Inflation.
34:38Yeah.
34:39And you're worried about unemployment.
34:41But you have no – you don't make any decisions about what the impact is going to be on the currency or the dollar.
34:46In other words, the impact of what you decide to do on the dollar
34:49is not something you're mandated to worry about.
34:51Is that right?
34:52That's right.
34:53The administration has that portfolio, the management of the dollar for what that is.
34:57It used to be something different than what it is now.
34:59But we – for us, the effects of the things that we do or don't do on the dollar
35:04are just another financial variable like equity prices or things like that.
35:07But do you worry – if you're worried about inflation, as you obviously are,
35:10what about the debt the United States has?
35:12We have $35 trillion of outstanding government indebtedness,
35:16and we're adding about $1.6 to $2 trillion more or less every year.
35:20Aren't you worried about that on the impact of the economy on inflation?
35:24It's – so I am very worried over time about the deficits that we're running.
35:32It's not the Fed's job.
35:33We don't give Congress advice.
35:35But let me just say that we're on an unsustainable path.
35:38That doesn't mean that the level of debt we have is unsustainable.
35:41It's not.
35:42But the path we're on, where we're running large deficits at a time of full employment
35:46and healthy growth, is not a sustainable one over time.
35:50And we really need to get to work on that.
35:52I would hope this is a top-line issue for elected people whose job it is.
35:57It's not our job.
35:58And I believe that if you – I do talk to quite a few elected officials in Congress,
36:03and I think there is a rising sense that it's time to do something about that.
36:06And it will take bipartisan action to address.
36:10Let me ask you, in dealing with Congress, you testify I think at least twice a year
36:14before members of Congress.
36:16You do the House side and the Senate side.
36:18Have you ever suggested them having a joint committee so you don't have to say the same thing twice
36:21or they don't like that?
36:23This is in the law.
36:24It's twice in February and twice in July, so it's four times a year.
36:30This is – Humphrey Hawkins put that in.
36:33And, you know, it's a really – it's a tradition.
36:35And so the Senate went first last week.
36:38The House went first in this March.
36:41So they alternate.
36:42I think it would take – I don't know, but it would take –
36:44Do you get a lot of questions from members that you think are really adding a lot of good advice to you?
36:50I think the members ask excellent questions, yes.
36:53Thank you for asking.
36:54Hey, Joe.
36:55I'm generally very much pleased.
36:57But you spend a fair amount of time with members of Congress compared to some of your predecessors.
37:01Is that because you think that they add a lot of value or you just think it's a good courtesy to do that?
37:06I think it's part of our job.
37:07You know, in our system of government, it is the legislature that has oversight over the Fed.
37:11It's not the executive branch.
37:13In a parliamentary system, they're sort of one and the same.
37:15So it's the two committees.
37:17And so I spend a great deal of time up on the Hill talking to people in both political parties, House and Senate,
37:24just finding out what's on their mind
37:26and really trying to take on board their thoughts on the economy and on what we're doing.
37:31And I think they appreciate that.
37:33And I think that, to me, is really a big part of this job.
37:37The Fed depends on data.
37:39But how good is the Fed data collection efforts?
37:42In other words, are you using the same data collection methods you used 20, 30 years ago?
37:46Or because of technology, you have better data collection methods than before?
37:50And are you convinced you have data that's as good as the private sector has?
37:54Most of the data that we get is the same that everybody else gets,
37:57the unemployment data, the inflation data, not collected by the Fed.
38:00We do some data collection.
38:02And we've actually been, you know, dabbling in big data efforts for more than a decade.
38:07So I think we're, you know, we're very focused on the quality of data
38:11and collecting different kinds of economic data.
38:14During the pandemic, of course, it became necessary to do all kinds and find all sorts of, you know,
38:20different sorts of data to reflect what was going on in the economy.
38:23We did a lot of that, too.
38:24So when you became the chair of the Fed, what was the best advice somebody gave you,
38:28who was a previous chair of the Fed?
38:33What comes to mind, I can't think of one thing.
38:36I thought that what Chairman Greenspan said was get a set of earmuffs.
38:43And when you eventually are not the chair of the Fed and somebody succeeds you,
38:48what would be the advice you would give them about how to be a good chair of the Fed?
38:52You know, to me, I think it's a very special American institution.
38:59And it's one that works to serve all Americans.
39:02And absolutely critical to that is staying in our lane, sticking to our knitting,
39:07not, you know, running to reach out to the big, hot political issues of the day.
39:12And I think that's critical because once you do that, if that's going to be what you do,
39:16what's the case for your independence?
39:18You know, Congress has given us these powers.
39:20They've left us alone to do it.
39:22And really we need to do those things and resist the temptation to expand that mandate.
39:27That's what I probably will say to my successor.
39:30Now, when you want to go out to, let's say, have a dinner in a restaurant,
39:33do you worry that people are listening to what you're saying, they're eavesdropping,
39:36or you don't say anything that anybody has to make you worry about?
39:41So that is exactly what I worry about.
39:43I have found that.
39:45I get recognized now, and people at the next table are always listening.
39:48So we don't really go to restaurants.
39:50So what do you do?
39:51You just go in a private room or you don't go to restaurants?
39:53If you're at a restaurant, you need to be in a private room because, of course, the people free to eat.
39:58And, by the way, if someone at your table were to be well-served and start to speak loudly,
40:03everyone's hearing that too.
40:05So you've got to be – we just don't do that for now.
40:09We go to – we eat at home a lot.
40:11We eat at friends' house.
40:13Okay.
40:14Well, your wife is here.
40:15Where is she?
40:16She's right there.
40:17How long have you been married?
40:20About 15.
40:22Oh, 39 years.
40:24You have to add that up.
40:25You do the arithmetic, yeah.
40:2639 years.
40:27Okay.
40:28And you have how many children?
40:29Three children.
40:30And any grandchildren?
40:31We have three grandchildren.
40:32Three little boys, the oldest of whom is three, and all in the same family.
40:37So this is going to be quite a little place to visit.
40:41Okay.
40:42Well, look, we've known each other a long time.
40:45I congratulate you on doing a great job at the Fed and avoiding the hard landing.
40:49And thanks for earlier telling me when you were going to lower interest rates in our private meeting.
40:55I now know when interest rates are going to go down.
40:57No, actually, that's not true.
40:58You said you wouldn't tell anyone.
41:00Right, okay.
41:01Of course.
41:02Jay, thanks for a great job you're doing for the country.
41:04Thank you, David.