• 10 months ago
Kya Tehreek Insaaf Ko Saddar Pakistan Par Aetmad Nahi Raha?? Janiye Senior Wakel PTI Hamid Khan Se
Transcript
00:00 As a lawyer, please give your advice on this.
00:03 The people I have mentioned and others,
00:06 they will not be able to participate in the elections.
00:08 This is a final decision.
00:10 But this is not a sign of change.
00:12 There is a legal point on this.
00:15 Please give your legal opinion on this.
00:17 Ethically, whoever wins,
00:20 they should be morally bound by the discipline of PTI.
00:24 But legally, it will be easier to manage them
00:27 because they will not be legally bound by the discipline of PTI.
00:30 Is this right?
00:31 The point is that
00:36 the aim of this is to weaken the justice of Pakistan Terry.
00:40 And to remove the candidates in leadership of Pakistan Terry from the elections.
00:47 The hands behind this are those who want
00:50 the justice of Pakistan Terry to be completely removed from the elections.
00:55 The former MPs of Pakistan Terry are also being removed from the elections.
01:01 So I think that the decisions that have been taken today
01:06 are the only hands behind the plan
01:11 to remove the justice of Pakistan Terry from the elections.
01:16 This is a result of a judicial decision.
01:19 So you think there is a nexus between those people
01:22 who don't want the party to be in the field and the judicial decision?
01:25 Yes, exactly.
01:27 Those people who are bent on taking the part of Pakistan Terry
01:32 in the elections,
01:37 and those people who have a relationship with the leadership of Pakistan Terry,
01:48 and those people who are bent on taking the part of Pakistan Terry in the elections,
01:53 and those people who are bent on taking the part of Pakistan Terry in the elections,
02:00 and all these are the result of the same efforts.
02:03 This is a consistent situation that is coming before you.
02:06 Mr. Amir, you are giving your opinion about the Chief Justice of Pakistan Terry,
02:11 that he has become a part of this thought.
02:15 I am not talking about a single person.
02:19 I am talking about the people who are against the justice of Terry,
02:27 like the Election Commission of Pakistan.
02:30 I think that the decisions that have been taken after that,
02:34 I am not attacking anyone's intentions.
02:37 I am just saying that the decisions that have been taken
02:42 are not right and historically will be proven wrong.
02:46 Like in the past, there are many judicial decisions
02:49 on which people have been protected
02:52 and it has been understood that there was no justice.
02:56 It is possible that in the future,
02:58 this will happen on these decisions as well.
03:02 What is your opinion?
03:03 For those things that you want justice,
03:06 should the request be made in the court of Qazi Faiz Issa Sahib
03:08 or do you think that we have lost trust in him
03:11 and that the PTI should not be presented in front of him?
03:14 Look, it is true to a great extent that
03:18 so many things have been created
03:21 that the trust has not been maintained.
03:27 Okay, so it is possible that you are not in a position
03:31 to present yourself in front of him in any case?
03:34 No, look, we cannot leave the institutions.
03:39 We want to keep the institutions in place.
03:42 That is why we will show a great extent of restraint
03:47 that we do not attack the institutions.
03:51 However, under the law, it is allowed for every citizen,
03:57 every political person,
04:00 it is allowed that they can criticize themselves
04:05 in the appropriate words of any court,
04:10 that is, the High Court or the Supreme Court.
04:14 In the appropriate words, the law has allowed it.
04:19 And they should criticize in the law
04:22 and have the right to criticize.
04:27 This matter is in the senior party leadership.
04:31 The senior party leader, Mr. Sheraz Al Marwat,
04:34 the party translator, Mr. Rohit Fasan,
04:37 says that he is not a party representative,
04:40 he is not the senior party leader,
04:43 he does not know if he meets Mr. Khan
04:46 or if he releases statements from his side.
04:49 Then you also in a way,
04:51 you have clarified his statements.
04:54 What is the reason for this?
04:57 The elections are still 20-25 days away.
05:00 Then there should be no such statements
05:03 so that the party's attention is focused on the elections,
05:06 not on these matters.
05:08 Look, these are the kind of people who are doing it,
05:11 whose duty is to create a division in the party,
05:16 to create a division in the party,
05:19 and so that the establishment can say
05:22 that the party has divided among itself.
05:25 Those who we think are not even the face of the PTI,
05:30 I don't know where they have come from,
05:33 when they try to divide among themselves,
05:37 there are other factors behind it
05:41 that are involved in creating various divisions in the party.
05:46 But sir, the one you are giving this opinion about is no one else,
05:48 but Imran Khan sir,
05:49 he is the party's senior knife,
05:51 has he received a notification about this?
05:55 As far as he has told me,
05:57 he has said that no, I have removed him.
06:01 Because in the Mar-Mar party,
06:04 in the division party,
06:05 in the fight party,
06:07 they have been trying to create differences among themselves,
06:11 that is why Imran Khan sir has told me this.
06:14 You yourself have been told by Imran Khan sir that I have removed him.
06:16 Yes.
06:17 And sir, this, generally speaking,
06:20 when we talk about Pakistan's role,
06:22 do you think that the President of Pakistan has played his role well,
06:27 or has the PTI lost its confidence in the President of Pakistan?
06:31 Look, I don't think that his role is what we expected,
06:38 because in many cases, in very critical times,
06:42 he did not make the decisions that he should have made according to the rules,
06:47 because of which Pakistan's politics has been questioned
06:52 on the compliance of the constitution in Pakistan.
06:56 And that is why I think that there will be a lot of criticism about him in history.
07:03 For example, when he gave the order to dissolve the assembly in August,
07:12 he should have given the date of the general election within 90 days.
07:17 He did not, and he has opened a new chapter,
07:21 and because of that you see that in 90 days,
07:25 the need for the constitution, the order for the constitution,
07:30 was not fully implemented.
07:33 So, in this respect, I think that there are many such cases
07:38 in which he did not play his role fully.
07:43 And do you think that the reason for this is that you sympathize with him,
07:47 that there will be a lot of pressure, so he did the best he could,
07:50 or do you think that his heart has changed?
07:55 Look, I have never met him,
08:00 so I can't say what pressure he was under,
08:03 but one thing is certain, that whatever decisions have been made,
08:09 for example, about 2-3 bills, he said later that I said that they should be returned,
08:16 I am not at all ready to give any assent to them.
08:20 At that time, he should have said in writing that,
08:24 taking the wrong advantage of it,
08:27 two such laws have been made, which have been considered to be law,
08:33 although I don't think that their laws are made by the act of the parliament,
08:38 the amendments in the Official Secrets Act and the amendments in the Army Act,
08:44 both of them without the assent of the president,
08:47 they can never be made into law,
08:49 and in my opinion, those laws have not been made yet.
08:52 But there was some weakness in that too,
08:56 at that time, he should have sent them in writing,
08:59 he instead told his subordinate to return them,
09:03 he said it verbally,
09:05 and he was displeased with what he said,
09:08 and he said that he had not said it.
09:10 What was the result?
09:12 The result was that two wrong kinds of laws,
09:15 which were not really made,
09:18 were considered to be law,
09:21 and they were made a part of the statute book,
09:23 under which cases are being run,
09:26 under which people have the right to appeal,
09:29 and under which even military courts will be given an appeal,
09:33 this is a huge loss.
09:35 If at that time, he would have rejected them in writing,
09:41 and sent them back to bring them in joint session,
09:45 then this matter would have been over.
09:47 Even then, I believe that those laws were not made,
09:51 the Act of Parliament was not made.
09:53 Thank you very much, sir.

Recommended